Loading market data...
Finance · South Africa

Eskom Green: Is It Privatisation by Another Name?

By OnABudget News Team · Source: Moneyweb · 2026/07/22 · Updated 2026/07/22 · 3 min read

Quick summary

Eskom Green, a new energy initiative, has raised concerns about socialising costs and privatising profits. Discover its potential effects on South Africans, jobs, and small businesses.

What happened

Eskom Green is a government-backed initiative aimed at expanding renewable energy availability in South Africa. However, the initiative has faced criticism from unions such as the General Industries Workers Union of South Africa (Giwusa). Union president Mametlwe Sebei has warned that this move could be a form of hidden privatisation, where state subsidies support large corporate monopolies, yet profits from these ventures remain private. The essence of her criticism is that while the public shoulders the financial risks, the benefits primarily go to private shareholders.

Why it matters

South Africa’s electricity sector is crucial for the country’s economy, jobs, and everyday life. For decades, Eskom was the dominant state-owned entity supplying power. But with constant load shedding and financial troubles, the government has been pushing for new solutions, including renewable energy projects under the Eskom Green banner.

The concern is that if Eskom Green leads to private companies taking a bigger share of the energy market, it might increase energy costs for consumers, particularly affecting households and small businesses already struggling with high electricity prices. Furthermore, if the government continues subsidising these companies, taxpayers indirectly fund their profits without gaining direct control or lowering electricity tariffs.

What this means for South Africans

For everyday South Africans, Eskom Green might eventually mean more renewable energy options and potentially more stable electricity. Renewable sources such as solar and wind could reduce dependency on coal and limit load shedding.

However, there are worries about how the costs and benefits will be distributed. Many ordinary consumers are already burdened by rising electricity tariffs. If private companies use state subsidies to build renewable projects but then charge high fees for electricity, consumers may pay more in the long run.

The debate also highlights larger concerns about privatisation in key sectors. If essential services like electricity continue to shift towards private ownership or control, it may reduce government’s ability to regulate prices and ensure fair access.

Impact on consumers, jobs and small businesses

Consumers, particularly low and middle-income households, could face higher electricity costs if Eskom Green favours private investors. Increased tariffs would strain monthly budgets, forcing families to cut back on other essentials.

Small businesses, which are vital for South Africa’s economy and job creation, are sensitive to electricity price changes. Higher costs could reduce their profitability and growth potential, leading to fewer jobs or even closures in a tough economic environment.

On the other hand, Eskom Green’s focus on renewable energy might create new job opportunities in green technologies, installation, and maintenance. These jobs could benefit communities affected by the decline in coal mining and traditional energy sectors, but only if inclusive employment and training programmes are part of the strategy.

Risks and limitations

While transitioning to renewable energy is critical for South Africa’s environmental goals and energy security, managing the change fairly and transparently is a challenge.

A big risk is that subsidies could be misused or disproportionately benefit a few large corporations, leading to increased inequality and public distrust. There is also the danger that accelerated privatisation without proper regulation could reduce government control in an essential sector, limiting South Africans’ ability to influence prices or service quality.

Transparency around Eskom Green’s funding, ownership, and profit-sharing models is essential. If the government can strike a balance between encouraging private investment and protecting consumer interests, the initiative could support a more sustainable and affordable energy future.

For now, South Africans, small business owners, and workers should keep informed and engaged in discussions about Eskom Green and energy policy. This will help ensure that the transition to greener energy also supports fair access, affordable prices, and job creation across the country.

Source: Giwusa union warning on Eskom Green and privatisation concerns.

OnABudget takeaway

While Eskom Green aims to boost renewable energy in South Africa, it's crucial to watch how costs and benefits are shared. Consumers and small businesses should stay informed and advocate for fair pricing and transparency as the energy sector evolves.

Frequently asked questions

Read the original article on Moneyweb

Related articles

Read next on OnABudget